This video shows some astounding statistics as well as the inability of the Democratic Party to Get It.
They never learn from history because they are afraid of a loud recurring fringe of Marxist radicals who aren’t Democrats at all. But you see, they have nowhere to go since their own fringe parties died out long ago. So they continually try to hijack the Democratic party and are solely responsible for the fact that we have only elected two Democratic presidents in the past 30 years. Only one of them served two terms, and saved the dying party besides. That was Bill Clinton. Do you know why? Because he was a moderate–just like the true majority of the Democratic Party.
No, we should not threaten to “leave the party”. We should drive them away instead, just like we did during McGovern, Mondale and Dukakis. I won’t even get into Kerry. The answer is simple. They either pick a winner to run for President — or we, the majority of the Democratic Party, will help to defeat a loser–just like all the other times.
Brought To You By our friend at http://comealongway.blogspot.com/
Filed under: Uncategorized
--Graphic by Freedom Fairy
--Graphic by Dances With Pumas
"This is not culture. This is not custom. This is criminal."
Good clip. History in the making. It remains to be seen how the MoveOn turds and the SDs react. And she’s right: if the party were on even keel Hillary would already be the nominee. They know they can win with her; they know it’s only her husband who gave them a two term presidency in the last sixty fucking years; something must really be wrong with those weirdos if they don’t shape up.
31 May and the genius of Donna Brazile awaits. Cheers.
You always find the coolest things. Awesome work!
You are right Uppity! Screw them. We shouldn’t have to leave!!! Let them hop in the next thing smoking and get on out of this Party!!! The Obamazoids, like their “leader” are a poison that is deadly and I’m sick and tired of it.
What Democratic Party has learned lately is how to apply Chicago politics, with a giant dash of 3rd world sleaziness to overtake, ignore and rationalize into non-existence the Will of the People: See here for how:
REPOSTING THIS COMMENT because voters need to Wake Up to what’s behind the bo bs ‘momentum’:
SUPERDELEGATES STEAL THE PARTY
As HBO just aired “Recount” we all just got a reminder that the 2004 election was stolen in favor of corrupt, powerful political pandering.
What is tragic, in review, is that THIS ELECTION (or at least the Nomination) is BEING STOLEN long before the November election date! I am one of many who have been working hard for Hillary, on the phone, blogging, contacting others, etc. Doing all this gets discouraging when, after Hillary Clinton’s enormous trend of Primary Election wins, including most significant large states, like CA, PA, Tx and OHIO and pivotal states like IND & NV and Southern States including KY, TN, WVa and (yet to be counted FLA), she (and we) have just seemed to get further behind -IN THE COUNT THAT MATTERS – the number of endorsing Delegates.
So, in frustration, I determined to research what is actually going on. As a whole, outraged-about-to-exit-the-party Democrats blame the DNC – and rightly so. Had Dean not manufactured a 2 state vote fraud, which not only deprived Hillary Clinton of earned delegates in large numbers, her (our) campaign would have maintained the momentum it truly represents – in terms of THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
So much has happened so quickly, in the twists and turns of this propagandized, bias contest, that I felt a need to pause and take stock in overview of Obama’s current Delegate strength – to which I heard 29 more SDs were added over the holiday weekend.
Looking back, maybe some besides me, recall when Obama screamed foul on Super Delegates, claiming these high-impact votes should follow the WILL OF THE PEOPLE. It doesn’t take a full, working brain to recognize that any caucus claiming to represent the will of the people of its state is making an erroneous claim. And considering the broad incidence of fraud involved in these Democratic caucuses, that point should be emphasized.
However, having just spent a day on the FACTS & FIGURES of Super Delegate representation, state by state, I have come to a new and even more sobering conclusion – not just in some broad philosophical sense -but BASED ON SPECIFIC, COMPLETELY UNREPRESENTATIONAL PATTERN OF DELEGATE ENDORSEMENTS, thus far committed, on a state by state basis.
Here are some appaling examples OF EXACTLY WHO IS STEALING this election. (H is Hillary O is Obama)
Super Delegates state by state contribute to the recent totals of Hillary Clinton: 278.5 and Obama’s 314.5 (i have not reviewed here the other categories of SD’s, having already seen the clear trend of Obama support building there in the last 6 weeks.)
STATE LEVEL anomolies in SD commitments, as follows:
IL O/28 H 0 3 remain O won with 65%
IND O 7 H 4 1 remains H won 51%
KY O 2 H 3 3 remain H won 65%
MS H 0 O/4 3 remain O won with 61%
Neb H 0 0/ 6 O remain O won with 49%
Nev H 2 O/2 5 remain H won 51%
ND H 0 O/7 1 remains O won with 56%
OK H 2 O/5 4 remain H won with 55%
SD H0 O/6 1 remains not yet voted!
TN H6 O/4 7 remain H won with 54%
WVa H 3 O/3 4 remain H won huge 67%
Wi H 2 O/14 2 remain B won with 58%
Wy H 0 O/3 2 remain B caucus 61%
Gm H 2 O/2 1 remain
The pattern above DEMONSTRATES THAT SUPER DELEGATES ARE NOT FOLLOWING THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. In so far as the only other criterion for their voting (against the will of the people of their state) has been established to be EXERCISING SOUND JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF THE PARTY, we certainly know that DOES NOT APPLY to these votes above, since the Dem Party is enraging and alienating its long-time members.
Please take the time to review the charts above to absorb the significance of the pattern THEY CONSISTENTLY FOLLOW:
IL did go for O. But H got about 35% of vote. Notice 28 delegates endorsing O. H delegate support ZERO!
IND a win for H hard fought with only 2 AA districts in whole state for O. But LOOK WHERE the SD’s have gone – against the will of the people!
KY, OK, TN, WV Sweeping wins for H. But look at the SD commitments for O, with a RECURRING PATTERN AS IN ALL THE STATES OF H’s rightful SDs either backing O or HOLDING BACK SUPPORT against the clear Will of the People.
MS, ND, Neb, WI Yes O won (but in these states early on – and buyers remorse is probably running high) Nevertheless the SD votes for him are HUGELY DISPROPORTIONAL toactual % won!
Next, notice the states with NO- ZERO – SD votes in for H, even though she won SUBSTANTIAL PROPORTION OF THESE STATES VOTES! + States w/ SD votes in BEFORE state primary!
Sure, many have said the FIX IS IN, but to drop the cliches and look at the rigged, arrogant, irrational SD votes on which Obama is planning to usurp the Nomination is a TRAVESTY to DEMOCRACY. It makes the 2004 Recount theft a minor incident, by comparison.
LaRouche site said last week that Edwards was pressured to commit for Obama NOW – or threatened with absolute disenfranchisement from the party! LaRouche is known for getting inside information. Whatever ha been promised or given to these FALSE DEM PARTY SDs must be brought to a halt!
How long are We the People going to be fed lies about the importance of the will of the people when the Media is against us AND our own Party “officials” are LEADING THE LIE?
Please NQ readers, take the time to look up the SD endorsements for your Home State AND LODGE A COMPLAINT with SD’s there who have flauntingly voted against the general population’s primary outcome. Also, PLEASE REACH OUT TO ALL NONCOMMITTED SD’s and remind them that their state already has unfair, misrepresentation for Obama but does not reflect support for the People’s candidate in their state.
You can go to
http://www.lobbydelegates.com
Though their list may not be complete, it can be selected, state by state and by candidate supported so far.
I really think that this State by State Delegate Anamoly above warrants more attention on blogs and in local newspapers, since MSM has buried these FACTS behind the shoddy, slippery figures that we are being told will replace the Will of the People!
uppity, video you’ll LOVE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8oHLJSvrFA&eurl
incidentally, got this from hillaryis44.org where I left an SD email list and a warning to them they’ve being faked out by a new substitute site – hillaryis44.blogspot – which has only 1 purpose – TO WIPE OUT and misdirect their traffic. This new site takes comments from the real site and twists them in vile ways.
Guess what, neither the SD email list nor the warning to their Admin made it through to them. Also saw dontvoteobama admin was in their comment thread, saying: where are my comments to you going – they’re not showing up.
These hackers are going to have karmic hell to pay – and how about a Class Action lawsuit (later when we have more time) as I’m sure they are violating numerous state laws regarding misuse of internet.
I can easily see where someone could mimic a website as in hillary44.blogspot. It’s not illegal to mimic the title of a site. Malicious yes, but illegal, I am not so sure. A person doing a search could end up there. That’s why it’s important to pay attention to the actual name of the site we click on.
I should tell you that, as a former software engineer and a serious freak about computer security, I have a hard time with the other problems being hacker activity. It just doesn’t add up. If somebody could block comments as a hacker, then that same person would have access to administration of the entire blog or site. Therefore, if I were a hacker, I would just wipe out the whole site rather than doing little gremlin things like holding back the publication of comments. Comments at sites can OFTEN be caught in a spam filter or in a moderation pile. I myself found earlier this week that ALL my NQ comments landed in moderation when nobody had moderated me. It happens. Software is only as smart as a human makes it. If securities are too tight, good things sometimes get caught in with the bad. It’s a tradeoff.
I honestly don’t think based on the information so far that, other than being mimicked by some blog troll, there may be nothing else going on there. It’s highly possible too that your “list” was so long that your post got nailed by a net.
To be honest, I myself had such problems seeing my posts show up at that site months ago, that I stopped posting there. Now I just read the site. I just think they are doing a security trade-off. I would too.
I think it’s possible they are in “approval” mode and can’t catch up because of the traffic..The more popular a site is, and theirs is VERY popular, the more chances there are of these glitches. I would say that unless the administration of Hillary44says they believe they have been hacked, you shouldn’t assume that’s the problem.
It’s easy to get worked up only to find it’s just a glitch. K???
Unityindiversity & Uppity, great posts. Linked to them at the HillaryClinton Forum: http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=13569
Lillian
No, we should not threaten to “leave the party”. We should drive them away
I’m with you 100%. I’ve been voting since 1978 and have never once voted for a single Republican. Now, I will never again vote for a Democrat and I am going to work hard to get John McCain into the White House and all the Democrats out of Congress.
Uppity – As always great post with your superb logic. We WILL drive them away, after November, if we can’t get some of the worst of the Marxists arrested first – Karmic payback for time not served in the 60 and 70’s.
Had to smile at this comment on your blog:
“using my materials as communication exhibits to others, please make it clear that you are not Uppity Woman. Thanks!”
Are people now pretending to be you?
Nellie
“using my materials as communication exhibits to others, please make it clear that you are not Uppity Woman. Thanks!”
Are people now pretending to be you?
That one must have slipped by me. Where is that comment located?
Ah foiled. Alas I am the pod that has taken over Uppity Woman. I shall hereby be referred to as Uppity Clone.