Cross-posted with permission of Lady Boomer NYC. Do not copy this post without direct permission from the author.
© Copyright 2009 by Lady Boomer NYC, article and audio interview. All rights reserved.
done
“What’s Your Point, Honey?” movie trailer
Filmmaker Out to Elect Women for President
Many feminists were disgusted this past year by the sexist, misogynistic treatment that former NY Senator Hillary Clinton received during her Presidential run, at the hands of the mainstream media, the fauxgressive blogosphere, stalwart feminist organizations, and members of her party. This time, Republicans didn’t seem to have quite as much to add, because Clinton’s own Democratic Party, we were shocked to observe, outperformed them in maltreating her.
Amy Sewell, award-winning filmmaker of the endearing 2005 documentary, Mad, Hot Ballroom, is doing her part to help elect a woman President of the United States. Her latest thought-provoking 2008 release, What’s Your Point, Honey?, is the first social justice cause film that’s being marketed on amazon.com and on itunes, too. I’d agree with her point that:
Feminism, gender inequality, is the longest revolution and the last social justice cause to have a great need to be brought to the surface and pushed out there.
Radio Interview Explores Feminism, Gender Equality, and Path to Politics
In January, 2009, I sat down with the dynamic and articulate filmmaker to record the audio interview from which this article is drawn. In the interview, Amy and I also discuss: women’s pay equality issues, the Lilli Ledbetter Act, gender inequality awakening of Baby Boomers as compared to the MTV generation. Plus, there’s an update about the lives of the seven diverse young women in her film, and their quest to run for political and organizational office.
Click arrow to play Lady Boomer’s interview with filmmaker Amy Sewell (1:41)
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
The Point of What’s Your Point, Honey?
The film’s title, What’s Your Point, Honey?, was inspired by a 2007 Jim Borgman cartoon in the Cincinnati Enquirer. The cartoon depicts Hillary Clinton standing, pointer in hand, appearing to school Uncle Sam in front of a chart entitled, “Countries That Have ALREADY HAD FEMALE Heads of State.”
Here’s the list: Haiti, Nicaragua, Panama, Ecuador, Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Burundi, Liberia, Indonesia, Philippines, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Mongolia, India, Germany, Serbia, Israel, Switzerland, Finland, Norway, England, Latvia, Iceland, Ireland.
And in response, a schlumpy-looking Uncle Sam asks Hillary,
What’s your point, honey?
In our interview, Sewell expands on the cartoon’s irony: The US is 71st in the world in women’s representation in government — we’re laggin’. We’re behind the -stans and Cape Verde. . . . Despite often horrible treatment in some of the countries that have had women leaders, women are proportionally better represented and lead other countries in far greater numbers.
The filmmakers set out to influence the younger generations with their film, and to create an awareness of feminism in them, because many young women “do not believe that they’re not equal.” Additionally, Sewell says that she and the film’s director, Susan Toffler, decided to reclaim the term “honey,” in order to devalue it when used by the oppressor, so to speak.
Co-stars of the documentary, “What’s Your Point Honey?,” include Sewell’s twin daughters, the generation of girls “that doesn’t believe that they’re not equal.”
Hidden Inequality
They made a movie for an audience that doesn’t want to hear it, Sewell asserts, because they think they’ve got it all in the bag. They see their moms going to work and just think that everything is equal—after all, mom’s working. Girls don’t really know what their moms go through at work, regarding career advancement, pay differences, harassment, and what is expected of them as compared to men.
Girls don’t grasp that women, despite feminist gains of the last forty years, are largely responsible for taking care of: the house, the kids, doctors’ appointments, day care, child care, shopping for groceries, supplies, and clothing, cooking, cleaning up, housecleaning, laundry, and more. Additionally, their moms are often caregivers for their elderly parents or in-laws. Yet, girls of today think that life is, and will be, the same for them as it is for the boys they’re growing up with.
Forget about equal pay: Sewell says that women should actually get paid MORE than men. After all, the mom does everything, and the dad “just goes to work,” as a young boy observes in the film. Yes, we’re swimming in the patriarchy, so much so that many fish don’t know it, haven’t seen it. However, girls are beginning to see sexism and inequality at home, and more women saw it in the political atmosphere of the 2008 Presidential election.
Eyes Wide Open—Lessons from Sarah
Sewell claims Sarah Palin lit a fire under many liberal women who thought, “hey if she can do it, why can’t I?” We should be running for local offices and positions that grow us into more and higher national prominence. A way to begin is to step up and get active about the projects and issues you really care about in your local community, and just go ahead and start to run things.
She enumerates three lessons women learned from Palin’s Vice Presidential run:
- Women can be raising a family and become a major player, with the right support systems.
- If you multiply out all the ways you run your household, you can do it on a larger scale in your community, city, state, and nation.
- If Sarah can do it, why are we liberal women still on the sidelines, waiting for men or somebody to hand this to us?
The White House Project: “Beyond Gender to Agenda”
The film is based on a “contest” co-sponsored by COSMOgirl and The White House Project (WHP), an organization founded and run by Marie Wilson. Wilson is past President of the Ms. Foundation and co-founder of Take our Daughters to Work Day©. Her “Vote, Run, Lead” training program at the WHP recruits women to run for office. Since its beginnings in Colorado four years ago, the program has expanded to ten states. They select young women who are definitely interested in running for any office and serious in their intentions, and equip them with the tools they will need.
Wilson believes strongly in having a nonpartisan organization, because her philosophy is that all women bring the same basic life issues to the table, such as: child rearing, child and elder care, the wage gap, working in male-dominated fields, and, of course, who owns their bodies. The goal is to get more women into office. Women are 51 percent of the population, and 80 percent of the purchasing power. Women decide how 80 cents of every dollar in American households will be spent.
I questioned Amy: If women treat each other so poorly when running for office—as they did with Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin last year—will women be discouraged from running in the future, expecting that they might face a similar fate? Introducing the pipeline theory, she said that “it’s not about one. As long as you have only one woman running, everyone will always rip her apart.”
Sewell contends that if you have just as many women running as men, you get “beyond gender to agenda,” to quote Marie Wilson. There are many amazing, accomplished, powerful women out there; we just haven’t seen it happen in enough numbers yet, so we have to make our own way! But the environment is changing: Initially, Wilson asked women to run for office, because she knew that women needed to be asked. However, there seems to be an attitude shift in that women are beginning to step up and run. There were 100 applicants for the program in NY State, and several women who were in the film announced their plans to run for office right after completing their training.
Winners of the 2024 Project, co-sponsored by The White House Project and COSMOgirl, gather in front of The White House during the making of the documentary
The Key to Success: Fill the Pipeline with Young Candidates
As a way to keep the ball rolling and get younger generations involved, What’s Your Point, Honey? shows inequalities in their world today “wrapped around the metaphor of a woman running for President.” The filmmaker sees that girls can look up to the current women in power, like Hillary and Sarah Palin, but they don’t relate to them as they do to twenty year-olds, like those in the film.
If we build the pipeline, the more women we have wanting to come into political power, the easier it will be for all male political figures in the future to have a pool of applicants to choose from [for cabinet and other appointments.] [. . . ]
Our hope is someday that it won’t even be a question. We’ll have so many women in politics that we’ll de-genderize it.
Sewell is passionate about carrying through her message and continuing to reach an audience of women that can begin to fill the pipeline of participation in government, beginning with reaching young girls. Her new book, SHE’S OUT THERE: The Next Generation of Presidential Candidates: 35 Women Under 35 Who Aspire to Lead, will be released in April, 2009.
Further, an educational pilot program is being rolled out by North Carolina Political Center for Women: the What’s Your Point, Honey? DVD and study guides will be used as part of high school programs in North Carolina. This will be followed by programs throughout the US in middle schools, high schools, and colleges, accompanied by study guides appropriate for each educational level. Amy has generously provided the Viewers’ Guide here for you to download FOR FREE, which you can use when you buy the DVD, or rent or buy the video-on-demand (VOD) download.
Women Have Power
Sewell sees little advantage in fighting with people who do not and will not ever agree fundamentally, and I agree! Women need to join together and get involved with whatever social justice causes that move them. Furthermore, WOMEN have the purchasing power. Money speaks, and we have power here. For example, ads and products that call for our attention to speak out against: Boycott! The PUMA and some of the feminist movement made a difference by boycotting MSNBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, and network television due to their commentators’ misogynistic and biased stances about then Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, and VP nominee, Sarah Palin.
The movie purposely uses a light touch to draw new people into wanting to be active, and has a carryover affect. Viewers report that they begin to notice more instances of inequality or sexism in their daily lives, whereas before they wouldn’t have seen it. I encourage everyone to see and discuss this film, especially families. Be sure to rate, comment, and see what others are saying.
This is such an enthusiastic, supportive article, you’d think I have an ulterior motive, or am receiving some kind of net gain. I hope I am and do. I believe passionately, based on my spiritual and community background, that the societal road forward, onward, and upward must be: positive, collective, supportive, have dignity—and—be ignited, and driven by and for women. We can accomplish this by expanding girls’ and young women’s horizons, education, and opportunities for governance, and yes, the Presidency. Elect a woman? . . . “It’s not about one.”
.-.
© Copyright 2009 by Lady Boomer NYC, article and audio interview. All rights reserved.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
Resources
These are linked within the article and included here for your convenience:
DOC WEBSITE: http://www.whatsyourpointhoney.com/front/
THE WHITE HOUSE PROJECT: http://www.thewhitehouseproject.org/
AMAZON DOC VOD LINK: WHAT’S YOUR POINT, HONEY? ($2.99/week rental, $9.99/buy)
BOOK AMAZON LINK: SHE’S OUT THERE: The Next Generation of Presidential Candidates: 35 Women Under 35 Who Aspire to Lead
--Graphic by Freedom Fairy
--Graphic by Dances With Pumas
"This is not culture. This is not custom. This is criminal."
There is a really good book out there–Women for President, by Erica Falk, I believe the author’s name is. It details the media prejudice in eight poltical campaigns. Language conveys values of a culture, and good Lord, ours is scary. Good book, good message. Media is Bad.
The book starts off with Victoria Woodhall and her “dainty little boots,” and as we know after seeing Hil and Sarah trashed, it is no better today.
Wonderful, Uppity, thank you for posting!
AnneE — That sounds like an interesting book, thank you. – Here’s the full title: Women for President: Media Bias in Eight Campaigns by Erika Falk
Uppity,
Unfortunately, I have grown distrustful of other women since the debacle of Nov 2008. I have never been like that in my life. I have always had close girlfriends and am close with my sisters.
I have to admit that I lost a good friend this election. She was too smitten with Obama to care to acknowledge what went on with Hillary and Sarah. In the end, she told me she had to vote for Obama because she just couldn’t stand how Sarah Palin said, “You betcha.” Can anyone blame me for telling her I could never respect her again?
Both my daughter (age 17) and myself were sexually assaulted at age 15. This is serious stuff. I explained to her that as a mother of a daughter, I could not forgive her the dumbest excuse I have ever heard for voting uhm, against someone. She is a part of the reason women are treated like garbage in this country and especially by the democratic party. I don’t know if my reaction pissed her off, or scared her or if she just really didn’t care, but we haven’t spoken since election day.
I actually don’t hold out any hope that democrat women will win the White House anymore. Not in my lifetime. My friend was 31 years old and took part in a sexist free-for-all with no shame. She is smart and has had EVERY opportunity to know better…to be a better human being.
I can’t tell you what we women are up against, but whatever it is, it’s stronger than looking at my daughter in the face and saying, “I don’t give a crap if five guys forced you to give them oral sex, Palin’s regional dialect really bugs the heck outta me.”
Does anyone else feel as hopeless as me???
Miss T. I have plenty of bruises from the fight, but in the end it turned out well for me–even though this economy has set me back. I shall endure and endure well because I am tough and because I have no problem not living above my means. That si why I am not all that upset. I understand cycles. I lived through a few.
There will just be new bruises, Miss T. Complacency comes when you have nothing to Remember and you didn’t Fight The Fight. Unfortunately, the gains will have to be fought for again. The young ones will be up to the task as soon as they see that this kind of crap rolls downhill. They will put down the cell phones and forget the texting and the latest haircut for awhile, and they will prevail.I will just watch. In one way, I shall enjoy it, for you reap what you sow, but in another vein, I shall feel sorry that complacency allowed so much that was gained to be lost.
If I were a young woman starting out today, I wouldn’t vote for a single penis unless I knew his stand on the revivial of the ERA as written. That may come to pass too. We have seen the energy they poured into the last election, these young women…………so we know they have the mocksy. So no, I am not discouraged, just sad for them.
Hi Miss T,
Sorry for you and your daugther’s pain. Humanity can be a pretty rotten lot sometimes, and just when you have given up on them, they’ll do something kind or noble. Don’t give up, just keep going.
Your ” friend “sounds completely out of touch with reality. Who needs toxic people in their lives? One of the nicer things about growing older is that you weed out the deadwood from your life and do not feel bad about it. You are less likely to be governed by the dictates of society that tells you to be a good little girl and play nice.
As far as politics goes, after the election and the press’ disembowelment of Hil and Sarah, I started to believe that there will not be a woman in the WH until this country is a third rate power. I started to loose hope (perhaps I should be careful with the use of this word lest I be sued for copyright enfringement). But when I saw that there will be a record number of running for public office, I began to believe that perhaps the press and its naked contempt for women has raised our simmering rage to a quiet boil.
We’re not just talking here about electing women to office, nor even in our lifetime. As Miss T. sadly shows (I am sorry this happened to your family) through her own history, we are combating the history of misogyny and sexism perpetrated by the patriarchy in the West. As we saw last year, and continue to see, this patriarchal control is largely invisible to both men and women — that’s not to mention the fundamentalist treatment of women in Muslim and African societies. This is a fight that has and will go on, but what choice do we have?
The White House Project and this story merely put a positive spin on educating and enrolling new warriors into our better future. There are many legs to the race, and ours is just one. Last year has taught me that I cannot give up, and I cannot go back.
As a baby boomer who in a way missed the women’s revolution while raising kids and entering the workforce later in life, my eyes are now open forever.
Excellent article, Lady Boomer. Looks like an exciting film, too. I think the concept that as long as there’s only 1 woman running she’ll be torn apart is dead on. If we can get some of these young women to understand that, there may be hope.
Yes, Grail Guardian — Understanding and education of these young women and all of the women who need to support them on the way up!
I’m reminded of last night’s Top Chef finale (I’m a fan.) Although we can’t smell and taste the food, the viewers can get an idea via the preparation and other comments of what they’d like. I liked her style, and she was the only woman standing. The viewers voted for her to win as Top Chef. But for the finale, the show brought back three of the runners up from previous seasons. Of course, who knows what was left on the “cutting room floor,” Carla chose Kelly (I think that was her name), also the only woman of the three sous chefs. The challenge was to cook the best three course meal in your own style. On two of the important dishes, she deferred leadership to her sous chef, instead of cooking in her own style and using the taste and technique that got her there. She lost because of it. At the same time, the sous chef, whose personality it was to be more outspoken and renegade-like took the lead instead of just supporting the woman in charge. The sous chef of the winner said at the beginning of the process that he just wanted to help the contender win.
That’s all to say that sometimes we women are our own best enemies. My sense is that the White House Project and others programs like it can help and train women to gain that confidence to take the lead in challenging times. I continue to take lessons from Hillary.
Oops, by “I liked her style,” I meant Carla.
Oh, and I meant to say, from the beginning — what was I thinking? — thank you, Uppity, for having me here!!!
I’m just getting caught up on your latest posts. Although I’ve enjoyed visiting in the past, I haven’t done so enough. I love your writing, POV, topics, and am in awe of your output! Go, Woman!!!!!! Decided to solve it by adding you in my Google Reader.
Best, and keep it up(pity),
LBNYC