Achaminijerk Speaks and it’s not about hot dogs and 4th of July

Posted on June 29, 2009 by Uppity Woman

Get it yet, Barack?

You thought hot dogs were going to fix this?

Let me get this right: You actually thought that Iranian Islamofascist animals — who are killing off their young in order to keep their  7th century savage theocracy in place– would be interested in celebrating Independence Day, right? So would most ten year olds.

What’s next? “Wait till your father gets home”?.

(video stolen from RBO)

Filed under: Uncategorized

« »

55 Responses

  1. Grail Guardian, on June 29th, 2009 at 7:04 AM Said:

    It’s 3 AM and barfy’s out getting an ice cream.

  2. joey, on June 29th, 2009 at 7:36 AM Said:

    Zerobama arrogant self maybe his worse nightmares. Being naive doesn’t excuse his stupidity in believing that the rest of world’s crazy piggish regimes would respect his”soft calls” for fairness. What an immature calculation of ZeroPOTUS!!! Maybe MO can call Mrs Ahmadinechit for dinner or out for a night out too? LOL

  3. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 7:43 AM Said:

    Typical Asshat Obama qualifier. He doesn’t take Iran’s demand for an apology “Particularly because we didn’t do anything” (Paraphrase)

    Particularly because?

    WTF? How about something like IGNORING THAT HE EVEN MENTIONED IT!

    This is Obama’s Achilles Heel. He is absolutely incapable of NOT responding to any criticism of HIM. Ahmajerk can diss the USA all he wants, but attack Obama personally – now THEM’S fightin’ words.

    What a pantywaist narcissist. I guess he never learned “Sticks and Stones” on his trip to Pok-e-sthan, unless it was referencing the murder of women.

    Ass hat.

  4. mcnorman, on June 29th, 2009 at 9:07 AM Said:

    What a pantywaist narcissist. I guess he never learned “Sticks and Stones” on his trip to Pok-e-sthan, unless it was referencing the murder of women.

    So very true.

  5. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 10:06 AM Said:

    A very important story, ala Obama-Iran. READ THE BULK OF THE COMMENTS, and be forewarned.

  7. Uppity Woman, on June 29th, 2009 at 10:35 AM Said:

    Tell me THIS isn’t an interesting remark from a Honduran who made a comment:

    The international community does not know the fear and tension we Hondurans have been living under. Mr. Zelaya, with his Chavez-like aspirations, has plunged this country into the worst political and economical crisis it has ever faced. Our freedom of speech and basic liberties were being threatened. His plundered the treasury for his own political aspirations and he ignored the poor people he had sworn to protect. So today, we are celebrating.

  8. Uppity Woman, on June 29th, 2009 at 10:36 AM Said:

    FF that comment section is a goldmine.

  9. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 10:52 AM Said:

    UW – Isn’t it?

    I was appalled at the article and HRC via BHO, and the obvious turn our foreign policy is taking, under Obama, re Freedom and Democracy. That ObamaMedia is stomping these voices and the facts is more telling that you know.

    I think with this support he is trying to claim “Precedent” in our Hemisphere with challenging the constitution in unconstitutional ways.

    I have read on several blogs this weekend people talking about how they HOPE our own military would do the same under the same circumstances. The fact that people in this country are even TALKING ABOUT a Military Ouster of the POTUS is clear indication that his stance on and support of Dictators and Totalitarian Regimes is making people afraid.

    Of all the things I have worried about in my lifetime, a Military Ouster of a President who usurps the Constitution was never one of them.

    Now…wow.

  10. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 10:56 AM Said:

    In addition, how embarrassing will it be for the POTUS to have the Supreme Court say the decision (another one) of his SCOTUS Nominee was ruled “unconstitutional?”

    Apparently it won’t matter if he follows his preferred “Honduran Model”

  11. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:04 AM Said:

    And here is the Money-Quote from Pro-Obama Butt Boys Reuters: (link at right)

    “But Zelaya’s close alliance with Chavez, and his efforts to lift presidential term limits, upset the army and the traditionally conservative rich elite.”

    CONSERVATIVE RICH ELITE

    Make it about Class Warfare and the term “conservative” thrown in for good measure. Make it about ANYTHING but the fact that this story NO WHERE that I saw reported that the steps the President was taking were UNCONSTITUTIONAL from the outset.

    Beware. This is coming if we do not pay attention.

  12. joey, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:08 AM Said:

    wow FF, like Ms UW said, the link you provided about the honduras is really really gold. Now it opens my eyes to something that had been nagging about why Hillary was willing to take on SCOTUS job. Or had she just swallowed some of those koolaid potions?

    ————————————————————————

    “Mrs. Clinton has piled on as well. Yesterday she accused Honduras of violating “the precepts of the Interamerican Democratic Charter” and said it “should be condemned by all.” Fidel Castro did just that. Mr. Chávez pledged to overthrow the new government”

    “The struggle against chavismo has never been about left-right politics. It is about defending the independence of institutions that keep presidents from becoming dictators. This crisis clearly delineates the problem. In failing to come to the aid of checks and balances, Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Insulza expose their true colors.”

    —————————————————————————

    Really? True colors? So dang confusing at times

  13. joey, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:12 AM Said:

    Oh dear! Not SCOTUS but SOS job. My bad LOL

  14. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:17 AM Said:

    I cannot abide Clinton supporting Obama on this one. Her dances with wolves on Iran was bad enough, but this is out-and-out bad news.

    Hillary, it seems, has jumped the shark.

  15. Uppity Woman, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:33 AM Said:

    She jumped the shark the day she took the job. I feared this. SHe answers to HIM. HOw many of us have had to support policies of bosses we didn’t believe in? The only saving grace here is she’s at least competent in all she does.

  16. joey, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:55 AM Said:

    On Honduras case, Hillary is not that all competent in her jumpy judgement, Ms UW. Why jump the shark, why not think it thru before she passed judgement on the people of Honduras on their choice not to be ruled by dictactor rules? It ain’t pretty in Iran, sure it ain’t right for them too.

    Oh BTW i never came across this word “chavismo” LOL

    And I won’t work for any boss that has policies as sucky as Zer0bama has. I would resign. It’s everything to do with principles we uphold in our life, i.e. liberty and freedom. And we those, often times, peace and prosperity.

    Oh dear, I need more fruits to stress off!!!

  17. joey, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:58 AM Said:

    O o…..i made lotsa crappy (unintended) sentences LOL. pls don’t comment, ya’ll just try to make sense of them k

  18. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 12:03 PM Said:

    “It’s everything to do with principles we uphold in our life, i.e. liberty and freedom. ”

    Joey – EXACTLY.

    It is clear Obama loves Chavez and Castro and the brutal governments they have. The fact that Chavez is now talking about military action and Barack Obama supports Chavez is all we really need to know.

  19. imustprotest, on June 29th, 2009 at 12:11 PM Said:

    Hillary doesn’t agree with the military stepping in to remove a president. Perhaps the military felt they had no other choice. The culture of the latin american countries, central america in particular is that the military is involved in the politics of their countries. Hillary may have been arguing against setting a precedent of military involvement.

  20. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 12:15 PM Said:

    I must, if you read the story at WSJ, the military did not step in on their own. The order came from the Supremes, following, apparently, Honduran Constitutional parameters. Read. Hillay owns this one for Obama. Sorry to say.

  21. Uppity Woman, on June 29th, 2009 at 12:20 PM Said:

    joey, honey, Jump The Shark is a slang expression here in the USA. It’s orginal meaning:

    Jumping the shark is a colloquialism coined by Jon Hein and used by TV critics and fans to denote the point in a TV show or movie series’ history where the plot veers off into absurd story lines or out-of-the-ordinary characterizations. This usually corresponds to the point where a show with falling ratings apparently becomes more desperate to draw in viewers. In the process of undergoing these changes, the TV or movie series loses its original appeal. Shows that have “jumped the shark” are typically deemed to have passed their peak.

    It originated from a segment of Happy Days, when Fonzi rode a shark in the water.

    When we say H has jumped the shark, it really implies her taking of the SOS job and veering off from her own beliefs and what she really would do if she weren’t imprisoned as an employee of Barack Obama, who gives her orders on what to do. Knowing this would have to happen, this is why many of us objected to her SOS position.

  22. joey, on June 29th, 2009 at 12:34 PM Said:

    Oh okies, Ms UW….thanks for the explanation of jump the shark.

    still Hillary didn’t do herself justice in this issue, Ms UW. I disagree that she kow-tow to zer0bama unprincipled orders. She should know better or say nothing.

    FF, I pray that USA would not have to resort to military action to remove POTUS. Because by then, american would gone thru “chavisnism”? Obama-ism? For it to happen, right?

  23. joey, on June 29th, 2009 at 12:35 PM Said:

    Heyyyyyyy…i like “Happy day” shows…dang those were my golden years!!! LOL

  24. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 4:40 PM Said:

    Clinton On Honduras later today:

    A reporter asked whether the administration would insist that Zelaya be restored to power.

    “We haven’t laid out any demands that we’re insisting on, because we’re working with others on behalf of our ultimate objectives, which are shared broadly,” Clinton replied.

    “So we think that the arrest and expulsion of a president is certainly cause for concern that has to be addressed. And it’s not just with respect to whether our aid continues, but whether democracy in Honduras continues.”

    Clinton cited a “fast-moving set of circumstances” in Honduras that require close monitoring.

    “Our immediate priority is to restore full democratic and constitutional order in that country,” Clinton said at her first news conference since breaking her right elbow in a fall at the State Department June 17.

    And then, Zer0’s take:

    WASHINGTON (AP) – President Barack Obama says the weekend ouster of Honduran leader Manuel Zelaya was a “not legal” coup and that he remains the country’s president.

    Obama spoke to reporters in the Oval Office on Monday after meetings with Colombian President Alvaro Uribe. Obama said he wanted to be very clear that President Zelaya is the democratically elected president.

    Obama pledged the U.S. to “stand on the side of democracy” and to work with other nations and international entities to resolve the matter peacefully.

    Mixed Messages? Seems so. WITH HOPE, HRC has seen the data on the illegal path Zer0’s pal was taking and is parsing the issues in true diplomatic form.

    Zer0, on the other hand, wants his pal back and he wants it now!

    Asshat. Let your SOS do her JOB you dipshit.

  25. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 4:43 PM Said:

    also, forgot to add this and link:

    “”As we move forward, all parties have a responsibility to address the underlying problems that led to yesterday’s events in a way that enhances democracy and the rule of law in Honduras,” she added.

    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D994I12O2&show_article=1

  26. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 4:46 PM Said:

    “Clinton added that it was a fast-moving situation with an uncertain outcome. “So we are withholding any formal legal determination.”

    but not old ass hat. Nope. No sir.He gets right out in front He has declared it “not a legal coup”

    SAY WHAT?

    Mr. President? What exactly is a LEGAL Coup? Will we know in 2012 or sooner?

  27. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 4:50 PM Said:

    “we’re working with others on behalf of our ultimate objectives”

    me thinks, if Obama has his way, are Chavez, et al.

    ohboy. I hope not.

  28. imustprotest, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:15 PM Said:

    I’m still with Hill on this one, sorry guys. My guess is Hillary is the one with her “boots on the ground” (or heels on the ground) and is really handling this situation, and not as a “Chavez” sympathizer. More going on than meets the eye and I’m glad Hillary’s on it, Barry seems muddled in his briefings, methinks Barry wouldn’t even make a good press secretary, best he go out and order some more ice cream and let the grown ups handle things.

  29. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:24 PM Said:

    imust – I HOPE you are right, but the bottom line is HRC CANNOT DO what SHE wants. To keep her job she must do what HE wants, and he has made it abundantly clear he is backing the ousted Prez. It is ASTOUNDING that he sits by and endorses support for a guy who is in bed with Chavez and pulls his punches on Iran. The other mixed message is we want the students to protest in Iran over a flawed system, but we DON’T Want to support that same desire in South America?

    Obama is a dyed-in-the-wool Socialist and he is supporting Chavez and Co. If Hillary stands with him here, she will be toast and portrayed in ANY future election as the politician that supported the overthrow of Democratic Rights, a Sovereign Constitution and stood with Hugo Chavez to quash Freedom.

    There is no other way around this. America has now told the world we support dictators, with a very loud voice.

    And even though we have in the past, it has NEVER worked out well. Has it?

  30. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:28 PM Said:

    The more frightening part of this is how it bodes for OUR COUNTRY. If we have politicians, lead by the POTUS, who embraces Dictators at every turn and gets out in front of Diplomacy because of his ideology of Tyranny then we are TOAST, and your adoration for Hillary will not save us. I voted for her, I worked on MANY of her campaigns and I busted my ass to have the Florida Votes Count. And we saw what happened. Iran? Honduras?

    Try Florida and Michigan. Then see what happens in 2010 and especially 2012.

  31. Mary, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:31 PM Said:

    “methinks Barry wouldn’t even make a good press secretary,”

    Are you kidding, imust? barry can out “uh-umm-er” Gibbsy any day.

    You take on Hillary’s roll in the Iran crisis is interesting. One of the regulars at TD opined that she is staying completely out of this–using a conveniently broken elbow as an excuse–so that barry will fall down all by himself. Do you suppose we’ll ever find out?

    In the meantime, what of N. Korea?

  32. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:32 PM Said:

    In politics, the only way to win is to beat, join or leave. There just isn’t any other way. Hillary, it seems, has joined. If Obummer hadn’t come out and jumped her ship, I might think differently. But HE is in Charge and apparently he didn’t want to wait for diplomacy. He wants this dictator. Did you read the comments in the WSJ story?

  33. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:34 PM Said:

    Mary – this discussion has been about Honduras. I thought she played it well on Iran, ie quiet with a broken elbow, to let Zer0 F*** himself, but it seems she is with Obummer on this one.

  34. Mary, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:34 PM Said:

    When our old pal jojo bourbon said during the campaign that bobo would be tested from abroad during the first six months of his administration, he forgot to tell us the number of simultaneous tests, and that bobo would fail them all.

  35. Mary, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:38 PM Said:

    “Mary – this discussion has been about Honduras.”

    FF,
    Serves me right for tuning in late.

  36. Grail Guardian, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:40 PM Said:

    Mary,

    Not quite right – he did say it would “look” like he failed, but in reality he would win in the long run. Sounds pretty honest to me. Listen to the drunk veep – he usually lets out more than we’re supposed to know.

  37. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:47 PM Said:

    He actually said we may not agree with his decisions, but…

    and there was a good point brought up. Obama waited a week to say a WORD about Iran, and he is all over Honduras like the proverbial fly on s+++. ONE DAY and he is siding with the Leftists Castro and Chavez. Two weeks later, then three, Iranian’s are dying and the Mullahs are being given a pass. But Honduras? Wow.

  38. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:48 PM Said:

  39. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:49 PM Said:

    I have to go cook. I shall return!

  40. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:51 PM Said:

    When in doubt – post! LOL I was wrong

  41. Butters, on June 29th, 2009 at 5:52 PM Said:

    What?

    The Iranians won’t submit after losing their invite to the
    Blight House Party and losing the “Freedom Wienies” from the big ……….

    I’m shocked! Positively Shocked! NOT!

  42. foxyladi14, on June 29th, 2009 at 6:30 PM Said:

    i think barry,s goose is cooked.

  43. Freedom Fairy, on June 29th, 2009 at 8:14 PM Said:

    Mettle,Metal, Meddle. Words, Just words.

    Test the Mettle (courage) Test the Metal (strength) Test the Medle (Obama and Honduras)

    HOWEVER _ I was delighted to hear FOXNews AND ABC “Can I sleep with You Barack” Charlie Gibson BOTH describe the Honduran overthrow of a dictator as “The State Department and the White House being “at odds” or “Sending Mixed Messages”

    Perhaps Imust is right and HRC is dressing down Old Big Ears, but I still contend that the bottom line will be Obama. And he hearts Chavez. So much so, we are sending an Ambassador back there to breathe the sulfur.

  44. Uppity Woman, on June 29th, 2009 at 9:17 PM Said:

    So nobody even noticed I spelled MEDDLE wrong or are you just being polite because you know I can dump you? Bahahahah

  45. Uppity Woman, on June 29th, 2009 at 9:18 PM Said:

    I still say the orgin is METAL though.

  46. Mary, on June 29th, 2009 at 10:05 PM Said:

    UW,

    Here’s what a quick search showed. Metal and mettle were variant spellings for today’s metal. In the 18th century, mettle took on the meaning of strengh, spirit, character, etc.

    I like your explanation of test one’s metal (armor, weapons–literal ) morphing into test one’s metttle

  47. joey, on June 29th, 2009 at 10:33 PM Said:

    Mebutt started something about Hillary being on the wrong side of her beliefs…and it went viral on here. I put up a link not knowing how “nutcase & croakpot” it was…it went viral on Bernie Madassdoff’s post.

    Now y’all know why sometimes I just came on here and kept my mouth shut…kinda sitting on the fence…scared i might say something that could be argued, rationalized, analyzed and even criticized. Make senese?

    Oh dear what am I saying? ANTHONY where are ya…let sing “the house of rising out LOUD!!!!!!!!

  48. imustprotest, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:03 PM Said:

    Joey! Don’t be scared about saying something that can be argued, rationalized, analyzed and even criticized…….that’s why we’re all here! I don’t think anyone wants you to sit on the fence, that’s Obama’s job afterall! :)
    I’m not worried about people disagreeing with me here (except UW giving me the boot of course!), I have faith in few politicians, and Hillary is one! I don’t subscribe to the belief that she will abandon all principles b/c she’s workin’ for The One. I mean, that’s what principles are….things you don’t abandon to keep a job or a man or anything else. Hillary’s principles are WHY I voted for her, contributed more $$ than I ever, ever have to any campaign, and went to rallies and blogged….and why, to this day, I will defend her. Call it adoration if you will but it is based on facts, her record and the strength of her character that I believe in! I still stand with Hill.

  49. joey, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:31 PM Said:

    imust,

    i didn’t say that Hillary has abandoned ALL her principles, I was saying why had she abandoned her principle regarding Honduras.

    Thinking that, if she insisted her stance on Honduras now, she might jeapordize her “record and the strength of her character” that I believe as you do to be of Hillary Rodham Clinton

    Hliiary has always been my hero, imust.

    I have learned since she came to whitehouse in the 1990s that this is what a woman should be. Intelligient, hardworking and strong headed. She exudes experiences, charisma and displayed loyalty to her family and friends. And I like that she’s a woman:)

    Am hoping she’d change her stance on the present Honduras circumstances. And not just follow zer0bama’s instruction. I won’t accept that.

  50. imustprotest, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:39 PM Said:

    I guess the point of disagreement is that she needs to change her stance on the Honduras situation. I’m not sure she should. She is standing by the rule of law, and that’s a good thing. There’s still a lot unknown about what’s actually going on down there. My guess is that Hillary is well aware of the whole situation. I don’t believe that she is just following Barry’s instruction, remember, he’s the one who always follows her….he is NOT a leader, he just plays one on TV. I want to see this played all the way out until we know all the facts. If I am wrong about Hillary, I will admit it, I’ll be sad, very sad, but I won’t dispute the facts. Right now, there’s a lot that is yet to be learned, IMO.

  51. Uppity Woman, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:42 PM Said:

    Don’t laugh at me, but I just think that Obama would oppose the Honduras move because in the back of his mind he is thinking, Hey that could happen to me if the precedent is set. I mean that would have to be a nightmare for any president.

  52. Uppity Woman, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:43 PM Said:

    Joey Aunt Uppity would protect you! Even if imust puts pie under my nose.

    Trust me, that would be hard.

  53. Uppity Woman, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:46 PM Said:

    You know I don’t care about disagreeing so much as attacking one another personally. I can’t abide that and I will strike as you all know. I have no guilt about that whatsoever. You are a group of people who got treated like crap by obama people so yeah, I’m a little protective, but it’s how I am. I don’t ever see that as a problem here with our regulars. Once in awhile someone flies through and it happens but once everybody gets the toneof this place,arguments are always at a level of decency.

    Hey I’m disappointed in Hillary myself sometimes, even though I know “why” she has to do what she has to do. But that doesn’t make me any less bothered by it. Maybe because I think of what might have been and how much better off we would be if she were president.

  54. imustprotest, on June 29th, 2009 at 11:50 PM Said:

    Hey, hey, hey! I am not being mean to Joey! We are simply having a little disagreement! But UW, you are right about precedent. What Hillary is standing up against is the military removing a sitting president. We impeach presidents, we put pressure, worldwide pressure to resign, but we don’t have the military arrest and physically remove people from office, not in a democracy. As much as I can’t stand Obama, I would not condone a similar removal of him.

  55. joey, on June 30th, 2009 at 7:57 AM Said:

    imust,

    i knew you were not mean towards me LOL. we just agree to disagree. And that’s how we learned from each other. And still continues to do so.

    Thanks Ms UW, didya put on that mask on. The pie smell alone might be too tempting to resist huh:)

    Don’t remember ever seen anyone attacking one another on here. well…maybe sometimes, but I thought it’s their opinions. right or wrong. Overall, I thought there have been great discussions and sharing information for which I have always been grateful for. The regs are great people too, i must say.

    imust,

    sometimes, using military force to take unconstitutional dictator-to-be out is the only way. GWB did that in Iraq ( I didn’t like it at that time, but hopefully things will be better after Saddam is gone) and Afganistan. Oh yeah, things has gone chaos, but I believe it’d be for the good of these countries in the long run. Remember, blood have been shed for thousands of years inorder to attend democracy. Even in the soil of old USA.

    In the case of Honduras, the military was directed by their supreme court. From what I had learned the military only carried this enforcement after much debate with Zelaya who tries his “chavismo” tactic on his people, which is unconstitutional according to their democratic system of ruling. He wanted to abolish the governing term limits. Mind ya, South american leaders are not like USA or Canadian leaders. Their cruelty and brutality against their own people can go on undetected, even unchecked. But you already know that.

    And Obama should be impeached if he does the same. And if he refused to step down if found unconstitutionally wrong, he should be dragged out or be locked in dick cheney’s bomb shelter, should he refused . LOL.

    All that being said, where I am, any leaders who did wrong towards the people would be fired, or force to step down. Some jailed after being tried, constitutionally, according to the Rule of Law. And the neighboring countries, the leaders who oppressed their people have been forced to flee their countries for their safety.

    Lastly, all the people of this earth would love to emulate US consttutional Rule of Law without resorting tobloodshed or militarily forced out wronged leaders. Jjust that some countries will have to resort to “force” tactic, especially with leaders like Zelaya. And I hope Iranians are watching Hondurans.

Comments are closed.